So my parents will have been together for 30 years this fall, and they have been together through thick and thin, and there has been a lot of thin. They had a very controversial engagement because my mother was a single 22 yo with a baby, and my 32 yo father and her had only been dating a couple months when he popped the question (he was not the father of the baby). The kid that wasn't his, the age difference, and the short time dating made for it to be a little bit of a controversial engagement.
Anyway, to the actual point, when my parents got engaged, they talk to the pastor at the church that they met at. The pastor said to try being engaged, but to not tell anyone. Just to have the agreement between each other for a month, and see how it felt. It was like a trial engagement, try it on for size for a month, risk-free, money back guarantee.
My parents actually swear by this. Sometimes people get caught up in the proposal, and the excitement, and then after it starts to die down, the worries start to creep in, or you realize that knot in your stomach might be something more than just nerves. It's hard to undo something that you've already told everyone about.
Or, better yet, at the end of the month you could feel really comfortable and confident in your decision. Perhaps this would be the better place emotionally to be in when you tell everyone else your good news?
It also has the benefit of giving you the opportunity to talk. A lot of people (at least in my observation, feel free to disagree) rush into a decision about getting married based on gut feelings and forget to thoroughly discuss what marriage would look like. How many kids? What size house? What would be grounds for divorce? Should there be a pre-nup? If kids are in the future, when? And will one partner be a stay at home parent, or continue to work?
There are so many logistics when it comes to marriage, I think some people wait to have these conversations. Having a delayed announcement of an engagement might give you the opportunity to have these important conversations (and have them be more concrete than "wouldn't it be nice if").
So what do you guys think of delaying the announcement of engagement? I have also heard this being called "engaged to be engaged" where there are plans to get married, but it's not official yet. What do you think? Would you be happy doing it this way if you partner suggested this to you?
dragonfly141 days ago
Answer 1 of 4
I sort of like the idea because I can see the value. But I don't know if it's going to be totally practical. I think it would work only if getting engaged and planning on being married was something you were discussing for a while. But mostly, I think it would cause some problems. Chances are one of the two, probably the one being asked, is going to be so excited that she'll want to tell everyone and asking her to be secretive about it for a while doesn't lead to a whole lot of security that the one asking was so sure of wanting to get married in the first place.
StillFiguringItOut143 days ago
Answer 2 of 4
This sounds like a great idea. Ideally one would have explored a lot of these questions as part of getting to know someone; but to agree on the intent to get married seems like an excellent way to give two people a mutual purpose (and perhaps deadline) to put them into the mindset to explore these questions seriously and concretely.
RelaxIt143 days ago
Answer 3 of 4
This is why I love this site...I'm always learning great new things. This is an unbelievable idea. The worst thing about engagements is they are overblown. They aren't the wedding, they are just an agreement. And you're completely right, if you get cold feet, how do you back out after an entire party and dinner was thrown just for the engagement.
The hardest part is finding out if your partner is down with that too. Some girls have engagements built up in their minds just like weddings. Hollywood has definitely made them into these fairytale scenarios.